Rational Arguments
There are five main rational
arguments I would use. The first is that government mind control has been
proven to exist elsewhere by allied governments, the second is that there are
so many survivors in the western world stating the same form of abuse, the
third is that AGMC is simply on a continuum of state controlled
institutionalised violence, the fourth is that governments do commit illegal
operations and try to cover it up both in the country and overseas, and the
last is that similar forms of abuse have been either proven to exist or are
generally accepted.
The development of mind control
by the U.S.
government, specifically the CIA, was proven to exist in the mid 1970s through
the releasing of documents. Through FOI (Freedom of Information) legislation
the U.S.
government was conducting illegal and non consensual experimentation on people
in North American hospitals and prisons for understanding and developing mind
control. John Marks book The Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The CIA and
Mind Control and Alex Constantines Virtual Government: CIA Mind Control
Operations in America clearly exposed the many operations. Also in 1997, a U.S.
government enquiry into Human Radiation Experimentation accepted evidence from
survivors of mind control and their therapists that the CIA and other U.S.
government departments secretly conducted mind control on non conscious
children and adults. Therefore it was established and accepted by the U.S.
government that mind control did exist and was developed by the CIA.
Australia
is a close ally of the U.S.
and uses its military and espionage information and technology. It is not
unreasonable to believe that the U.S.
government did not sell or provide mind control technology and information to
the Australian government. This would be used for Australian government’s
abuse, the U.S.
government’s abuse and both. My programming uses the exact same words that were
used in the reports. These included Projects Artichoke and Bluebird and were
produced at the same places in the U.S.
such as the University of Urbana
Champaign in Illinois.
A simple web search of survivors
around the western world and their very similar accounts of the abuse also
verifies the similarities to that developed by the CIA. All the survivors write
about the same forms of programming and name the same projects and their abuse.
Its is very difficult to make up complicated mind control procedures and also
name the same perpetrators and places of abuse. And also like myself why would we they make these up? There is no
material benefit to be made.
The third argument is that AGMC
is simply on a continuum of state controlled institutionalised violence. What
we were forced mainly to do was military and espionage activities which exist
currently in the ADF, ASIO and ASIS. What we were deployed to do was stuff that
has now been declared illegal. Fifty
years ago soldiers would be openly killing civilians in war time or espionage
agents would explicitly spying on other citizens. What is different is that we
were programmed without our knowledge and taken advantage of because of our
innocence. The government now abuses innocent brainwashed people to do their
dirty illegal work instead of knowing soldiers and spies. Fascist elites don’t
change simply because of legislation. As with the development of the mind
control, they just use other illegal means.
The fourth argument is that
governments do commit illegal operations and try to cover it up both in the
country and overseas. There is a huge number of instances done by most
countries. The illegal invasion of Iraq
in 2003 by the U.S.,
Britain, Spain
and Australia
amongst others is a classic. The U.N. voted against it as there was no
substantial proof of weapons of mass destruction. The supposed information of
such was firstly falsified by the CIA which as the supposed most sophisticated
intelligence gathering organisation in the world and would have known that
these weapons did not exist. This information was then supplied to allies which
did not even question even though more reputable U.N. investigations proved
opposite or were not allowed to given its full time for investigation. These
countries simply wanted to believe the CIA because it wanted to invade. The government leaders, such as John Howard,
also wanted to believe the CIA information or even more suspiciously new it was
falsified and has attempted to cover up “the mistake” by “blaming” the CIA and ASIO.
Other countries, even those opposed to the invasion, also do extremely illegal
acts which are terrorist. For example, the French secret service agency, which
must have also been given orders by the presidency, bombed the environmentalist
groups Greenpeaces activist ship, the Rainbow Warrior, in foreign waters in New
Zealand’s Auckland
harbour. This was a terrorist act and was tried to be covered up by claiming
that a non government group did it. Unlike with the abuse of mc
victims/survivors, this time perpetrators willingly and consciously were doing
terrorist acts. Other major powers such as the Chinese and Russian governments
also do criminal acts such as the invasion of Afghanistan and totalitarian
control of Eastern European countries by Russia and the invasion of Tibet and
the Tianneman Square massacre by the Chinese government.
The last argument is that
similar forms of abuse have been either proven to exist or are generally
accepted by counsellors and community workers and many in the general public,
and in Australia.
The most obvious is ritual abuse. Ritual abuse has mind control, deploys people
to assassinate in cult ceremonies, has organised child and non consenting adult
prostitution and pornography, etc. Another is the acceptance by government
royal commissions into the existence of
systemic government department criminality such as widespread police
involvement in organised pedophilia and drug production and trafficking. Such
widespread criminality within a government department has to have some
“protection” from department heads.